-
Re: What was the very first typeface described as “feminine”?
It can certainly be taken too far, but beware of throwing out the baby with the bathwater, often simply to escape guilt by association. Although difficult to fathom and easily abused, leveraging gend…0 -
Re: Dutch IJ with dots
People who rely on IJ much more than me should be eager to explore its potential. But that's assuming they're open-minded. In any case, here you go: Do the single-acute ones look better to me only be…0 -
Re: Dutch IJ with dots
The lowercase "ij" is far more useful than the uppercase, it does't have to be ligated [so literally], and should not look like an accented "y".0 -
Re: Dutch IJ with dots
It would look (and arguably work) better with one spanning accent.0 -
Re: Dutch IJ with dots
@"Ben Blom" I find that all too hard-nose. To me an "IJ" that looks like a "U" is bigger mistake than using tittles to help readers; and something like "IJsbreker&q…0
